The Instrumental Value of Deliberative Democracy – Or, do we have Good Reasons to be Deliberative Democrats?

Abstract

Though commanding a prominent role in political theory, deliberative democracy has also become a mainstay of myriad other research traditions in recent years. This diffusion has been propelled along by the notion that deliberation, properly conceived and enacted, generates many beneficial outcomes. This article has three goals geared toward understanding whether these instrumental benefits provide us with good reasons – beyond intrinsic ones – to be deliberative democrats. First, the proclaimed instrumental benefits are systematized in terms of micro, meso, and macro outcomes. Second, relevant literatures are canvassed to critically assess what we know – and what we do not know – about deliberation’s effects. Finally, the instrumental benefits of deliberation are recast in light of the ongoing systemic turn in deliberative theory. This article adds to our theoretical understanding of deliberation’s promises and pitfalls, and helps practitioners identify gaps in our knowledge concerning how deliberation works and what its wider societal implications might be.

Keywords

systemic turn, democratization, instrumental effects, Deliberative democracy

How to Cite

Kuyper J., (2018) “The Instrumental Value of Deliberative Democracy – Or, do we have Good Reasons to be Deliberative Democrats?”, Journal of Public Deliberation 14(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.291

1529

Views

658

Downloads

9

Citations

Share

Authors

Jonathan W. Kuyper (University of Oslo, NO; Stockholm University)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 5cb4adc10815a9a81eed21bb3774c86d