Abstract
Engaging with the literature on deliberative democracy, this article contends that in the context of ethnic group hostilities, deliberative processes where participants have a genuine opportunity to communicate and ‘hear the other side’ can be a way for inter-group dialogue and reconciliation. Separating the deliberative process into three distinct moments, it offers a framework for understanding how unequal and conflicting parties may be brought together to deliberate, how to grasp the micro-politics of deliberation, and to understand the diffusion mechanisms that bring society back in. The approach we propose aims to bridge the normative-macro and the experimental-micro accounts of deliberation in order to focus on non-ideal real-life contexts and to offer ‘deliberative lenses’ to study the (rare) cases of deliberative inter-ethnic reconciliation. The approach and the three moments are illustrated by the deliberative turn taken to resolve a conflict between the Innu communities, the Quebec government and the local non-Innu in Saguenay-Lac-Saint Jean.
Keywords
Québec, Aboriginal rights, divided societies, reconciliation, intercultural dialogue, Deliberation
How to Cite
Dembinska M. & Montambeault F., (2015) “Deliberation for Reconciliation in Divided Societies”, Journal of Public Deliberation 11(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.226
1501
Views
584
Downloads
2
Citations