Why I Study Public Deliberation

Abstract

The author argues that scholars can best advance public dialogue and deliberation by conducting systematic research on practical innovations that have the potential to improve political discourse. The author explains and justifies this position through a personal narrative that recounts formative experiences with debate, group dialogue, political campaigns, academic research, and electoral reform.

Keywords

research, praxis, political reform, ideological conflict, deliberation, dialogue, activism

How to Cite

Gastil J., (2014) “Why I Study Public Deliberation”, Journal of Public Deliberation 10(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.183

164

Views

68

Downloads

Share

Authors

John Gastil (Pennsylvania State University)

Download

Issue

Dates

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: ca9321ddffaac27e213e81b360c477ab