By looking at the argumentative uses of ‘status updates’, we discuss how Facebook design and context of use influenced opportunities for deliberation during the Egyptian phase of the Arab Spring in early 2011. Our basic point is that, somewhat against the grain of much debate on designing precise tools for supporting online argumentation, many benefits for open and critical argumentation result, in this case, from unintended, indeed parasitic, uses of online technologies. This is evident in the ways that (seemingly) politically trivial, “commercially colonized” and entertainment-oriented technologies such as Facebook or YouTube become major arenas for deliberative mobilization and serious argumentation.
online deliberation, Facebook, dialectical trade-offs, argumentation design, argumentation, Arab Spring
How to Cite
Lewiński M. & Mohammed D., (2012) “Deliberate Design or Unintended Consequences: The Argumentative Uses of Facebook During the Arab Spring”, Journal of Public Deliberation 8(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.133