Deliberations on the Life Sciences: Pitfalls, Challenges and Solutions

Abstract

In this article I sketch several versions of the deliberative approach and then discuss five problems which confront a deliberative ethicist of contemporary problems of the life sciences, in particular about food, nature and agriculture. I begin by discussing problems of unequal participation in deliberations and secondly analyze cognitive and normative uncertainties that abound in the life sciences like biotechnology. Thirdly, these sciences comprise different scripts (e.g. nutrigenomics: personalized or public health) that steer the type of outcome, like products and services. Dependent on the framing, the products and services look different. Fourthly, multi-level problems are addressed, in particular the relationship between local, regional, national, international opinion formation and decision making. Fifthly, I will turn the table and argue that some scientific and technological project can have a large and severe deliberative impact and others not. Discussing these challenges I will develop some tools, like mapping different arrangements of the interaction between genomics and societal developments, developing imaginary futures by aesthetic explorations and by scenarios, by different moral screenplays and dramatic rehearsals, deliberative leadership, and designing deliberation eliciting technologies.

Keywords

life sciences, multi-level governance, uncertainties, framing, participation

How to Cite

Korthals M., (2011) ‚ÄúDeliberations on the Life Sciences: Pitfalls, Challenges and Solutions‚ÄĚ, Journal of Public Deliberation 7(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.119

117

Views

57

Downloads

Share

Authors

Michiel Korthals (Wageningen University)

Download

Issue

Dates

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 399ea132de9eb12b2ca6515b275e8d87