Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Power

Abstract

Among the most interesting contributions to contemporary deliberative democratic theory are a number of arguments against deliberation leveled by radical democratic theorists such as Iris Marion Young and Lynn Sanders. These theorists question the meaning and efficacy of deliberation based on deep and vital insights about the impact of structural inequalities and entrenched relations of power. We consider these insights to be critical cautions that deliberative democrats must confront, and offer a response that draws on both theory and practical experience. In particular, we suggest that careful attention to three fundamental challenges of deliberative practice, those of control, design, and democratic change, can go a long way towards ensuring that meaningful and effective deliberation is possible in the face of deep structural inequalities and complex power relations.

Keywords

democratic theory, power, deliberative democracy

How to Cite

Kadlec A. & Friedman W., (2007) “Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Power”, Journal of Public Deliberation 3(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.49

105

Views

111

Downloads

Share

Authors

Alison Kadlec (Public Agenda)
Will Friedman (Public Agenda)

Download

Issue

Dates

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: a1da4de4d9fda94024b1e5ec287d7f79