Abstract
Democratic innovations face the challenge of realizing deliberative democratic ideals in the context of structural inequality. Consensus decision making and expertise have been said to have exclusive effects on marginalized groups like women and ethnic and sexual minorities, which obstructs diversity. Wisdom Councils as practiced in Austria attempt to counter inequalities by including marginalized groups through the moderation technique dynamic facilitation. Exploratory participatory observations and interviews with a moderator and the participants of two Wisdom Councils in Austria provide a deeper understanding of the inclusive processes at work in Wisdom Councils facilitating a productive combination of consensus and diversity.
Keywords
diversity, consensus, inclusion, facilitation, gender, Wisdom Councils, deliberative democracy, democratic innovations
How to Cite
Asenbaum H., (2016) “Facilitating Inclusion: Austrian Wisdom Councils as Democratic Innovation between Consensus and Diversity”, Journal of Public Deliberation 12(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.259
1556
Views
429
Downloads
4
Citations